I should write two separate posts as what I want to write about today are unrelated, but as I don't always get here when I want to (or should!) I'll combine the two.
First of all, Edgar. He continues to thrive. He has supermodel legs. They go on forever and are comically topped with this scruffy pin feathered little (in comparison) body. There are photos of baby crows in Pinterest; all black and fluffy in duck-like down. He's nothing like that. He has adult feathers, most of them still encased in keratin somewhere along the shaft. His eye is pale blue and as he grows and grows stronger, he is more responsive.
Two days ago I was present when he had a wing flap. It was then I noticed one wing is noticeably shorter than the other. Not only shorter but some of the flight feathers are partially turned outward rather than lying flat against his body. Don't know whether this will affect his ability to fly or not. Don't know whether it was the reason he was screaming in the long grass. For such a vocal baby there wasn't a crow in sight - and we have many local crows. Was he kicked from the nest because he was imperfect? Nature is not sentimental. Staying alive is too hard. Anything that is compromised from birth is ejected/rejected without moral reflection.
There was a reason he was found by us. He put everything he had into that metronomic squawking and there was very little left to live upon when he was found which is why he was so weak and ill to begin with. But I thought Rupert (the rainbow lorikeet) and Lionel (the galah) were fostered by me for a reason too. I thought they would live - and they did until they were released and then, in a longer or shorter time, they were killed. No use pondering why (he was found) or if (he can fly), best just do my best for him and see what happens. In the meantime he makes me smile.
The other thing I want to cover isn't nearly as jolly. Much of Tasmania has been on fire. World Heritage areas on the west coast have burnt to a crisp. Thousand year old pencil pines gone forever. An interviewed scientist (just tried to find the article and can't) said it was a sign of 'system collapse'. Another article (http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-29/glikson-the-dilemma-of-a-climate-scientist/7123246 ) states that up to a third of climate change scientists believe the situation is far worse than what is fed to the public and that if we don't stop using fossil fuels now we are doomed.
This kept me awake most of the night. Not because I'm doomed. I'm 60. I'll probably eke out another few decades before the planet becomes unlivable (or perhaps, in an effort to save the planet, everyone over 60 will be euthanized). What kept me staring into the darkness was the plight of all those that don't have a voice. From the unborn to all the creatures; land, sea and air, which will die through no fault of their own. It breaks my heart. If we want to destroy one another, so be it, but must we drag everything else down with us?
So it started me thinking. Despite the human capacity for self-sacrific, despite our intelligence, our urge to beauty, our creativity, spirituality, generosity - we are a species seemingly doomed to failure. In the scheme of things, meaning the Infinite Universe, it's not a big deal. Other beings no doubt have come into existence, shone for a while and dimmed into oblivion for various reasons. Inborn hubris leads me to think humans are rather special. We have the ability to ponder, to reflect, to learn and to know joy. It would be lovely if those attributes were the ones that carried the day. For us and every other living thing. Unfortunately it seems greed, hubris, selfishness, fear and short-sightedness carry the day. And the earth.
On the other hand, if it's only a dream of Maya, we'll all wake up and shake our heads at the strangeness and overriding sadness of the dream. I wonder which reality is true.
No comments:
Post a Comment